Marvel Studios is an anomaly of modern populist filmmaking.
Based partly on the rules of comic book publications, serialized television and
the producer-driven classical studio system, Kevin Feige and the other Marvel executives designed a fruitful
model that spawns and nurtures multiple, converging franchises that can share
and swap characters. They’ve also successfully introduced general, non-geek
audiences to super-dorky pulp characters like Thor, Ant-Man, The Vision, the
whole Guardians of the Galaxy team and now, their nerdiest character of all,
Doctor Strange. The reason audiences continually eat this up is because of the
studio’s steady oversight and a strict style-guide that keeps their films
uniformed and consistent. In the case of Scott Derrickson’s “Doctor Strange”
this same-ness, delivers an amiable blockbuster but stifles the possibilities
for creative experimentation.
Benedict Cumberbatch plays our hero Doctor Steven Strange, a
smug celebrity neurosurgeon who’s looking to execute a complicated procedure
that will further elevate his status. Amid this pursuit, Strange is seriously
injured in a car-accident that leaves his hands unable to perform with
precision. As he travels the world looking for a miracle surgery that will
allow him to work again, he discovers a house of mystics in Katmandu that
promise to show him ways to heal himself through the use of magic and sorcery.
Strange is then caught up in a secret war between the temple’s Sorcerer Supreme
(Tilda Swinton) and a band of rogue magicians, led by a disgruntled student of
the dark-arts named Kaecilius (Mads Mikkelsen) who’s hell-bent on bringing an
evil entity upon the earth.
Derrickson’s history in horror filmmaking (“Sinister,” “The
Exorcism of Emily Rose,” “Deliver Us From Evil”) could have easily gone hand in
hand with the occult-leanings of the Marvel’s magician hero. Instead of punching
his way to victory or blowing up his opponents with wrist-rockets, Doctor Strange
uses his intellect and skills as a sorcerer to defeat other-worldly foes. Yet,
what we are given in this movie is another standard superhero origin story
about a reluctant hero who must overcome his own hubris for the good of
man-kind. Many beats of the plot repeat what we’ve recently seen in “Iron Man,”
“Thor” and “Ant-Man,” and the shiny, non-threatening tone of Marvel’s
happy-meal presentation disguises every genre cliché with lavish sets and
complicated special effects.
The post-Matrix/post-Inception visuals and the film's art-direction is spectacular and eye-popping—particularly the set-pieces and
fight-sequences that take place among the shifting and folding Escher-esq
cityscapes—but they are placed almost randomly and with very little stakes
within the story. Most of the screenplay consists of long sequences where
Swinton’s Ancient One and Chiwetel Ejiofor’s Mordo explain to Cumberbatch all the
ins and outs of mirror realms and astral projection and forbidden libraries and
magic imbued weapons and so on and so on. To the credit of the screenwriters
and the performances from the actors, this exposition-heavy dialogue is
peppered with enough humor and whit to distract from its utilitarian function.
Aside from a slightly rushed plot and another stale Marvel-Studios
villain with a weird face, “Doctor Strange” is perfectly entertaining and keeps
true to the company brand, but it’s the very nature of this idiosyncratic
character that begs for a less calculated approach. Given Derrickson’s past
work and given the prestigious background of the cast, the movie’s familiar
superhero trappings are more nakedly obvious and its getting increasingly harder to overlook Marvel’s unwillingness to
challenge their formula.
Grade: B-
Originally Published in the Idaho State Journal/Nov-2016
Listen to this week's episode of Jabber and the Drone to hear more conversation about "Doctor Strange."
Originally Published in the Idaho State Journal/Nov-2016
Listen to this week's episode of Jabber and the Drone to hear more conversation about "Doctor Strange."
No comments:
Post a Comment