Micheal Mann's male heroes were never
as simple or as ideologically set as the muscle-bound Rambo types of
the 80s, nor as damaged or doomed as the Travis Bickle types from the
decade before. Characters like Al Pachino in “Heat” or William
Peterson in “Manhunter” or James Caan in Mann's first feature
“Theif” were masculine, morally ambiguous, and darkly sexual all
at the same time. Taking his cues from classic film noir and the
burgeoning popularity of MTV, Mann pretty much invented this
archetype and up until recently had successfully reinterpreted it for
three decades in a row.
In his post-911 hacker-espionage film
“Blackhat,” Mann tries to return to his sexy crime-thriller style
and somehow drops the ball completely. Given the recent hacking
scandals at Sony Pictures, the leaking of private celebrities iPhone
pics, or the reveal of NSA intelligence breaches by cyber-savvy
whistle-blowers, this film had all the potential to be a timely and
intelligent genre movie, but as it would happen, none of that was
incorporated or considered and what we have instead is an
underwritten, uneven deodorant commercial that looks as though it
were shot by armature film students doing a Michael Mann study.
After an unknown cyber-terrorist
manages to hack the hydraulic systems of a nuclear power plant and
causes a near-meltdown, the CIA enlists prisoner and former
super-hacker Nick Hathaway (Chris Hemsworth) to help them beat the
bad guys at their own game. It's a simple enough action movie plot
structure to satisfy without complicating the formula, but once you
add a superfluous love story with the tag-a-long Chinese sister of
another hacker (Wei Tang and Leehom Wang) along with crudely
executed, digital shaky-cam action sequences, you're left with a
haggard headache of a movie. Even Oscar nominated Viola Davis as the
apprehensive CIA operative who agrees to let Hathaway out of prison,
so long as he wears an electronic anklet, doesn't help to bring any
depth or originality to this drab disappointment.
The script leaves no room for
character exploration or pathos and instead uses most of it's
dialogue to go over needless exposition. Hemsworth has nothing to do
here, and, looking not unlike Don Johnson in “Miami Vice,” is
comically miscast as the computer genius criminal. More frustrating,
because his role is so underdeveloped we never actually see how any
of his coding or techniques are realistically accomplished. Instead
Mann visualizes the hack-attacks and retaliations through goofy CGI
explorations of the inner-workings of computer circuitry; a strange
and obnoxious crutch. As previously mentioned, the tormented love
story between Tang and Hemsworth is uninformed and unmotivated and
eats up more than third of the movie's run-time.
The one element that should be able to
save a bad screenplay, the action, is so miss-handled by the visually
jarring transitions to cheap looking digi-cam single-takes that the
film simply toggles between being depressingly ordinary and
embarrassingly inept. There is the occasional flourish of style, as
best exemplified in the final showdown between Hemsworth and the
baddies as he tries to sneak up on them during a ceremonial parade in
Jakarta, but unfortunately these moments of clear and steady
direction are few and far between. Lastly, with it's awkward
integration of Chinese celebrities and locations, the film's
desperate attempt to pander to the Chinese market only proves that
Mann's faith in his own project was compromised from conception with
lazy and vulgar business choices, reflected in every aesthetic
decision on screen.
Grade: D
Originally published in the Idaho State Journal/Feb-2015
Originally published in the Idaho State Journal/Feb-2015
No comments:
Post a Comment