Monday, September 16, 2013

Riddick review



                 The statute of limitations for long-awaited—but not necessarily strongly desired—sequels has been tested with “Riddick”, the third film in the pulp sci-fi trilogy that help put actor Vin Diesel on the map. With four years between “Pitch Black” (2000) and “The Chronicles of Riddick” (2004), and another nine before now, “Riddick” has more to live up to than just satisfying the tropes and trappings of its predecessors. Now it must remind the fans why they cared in the first place, while at the same time enticing the non-initiated, Miley Cyrus generation.  Despite a promising first act, and a consistent lead performance from the stoically masculine Vin Diesel, this lazily titled offering suffers greatly from junior-slump.  

                The story picks up right where the “Chronicles of Riddick” left off. The Necromongers, a ruthless space-cult that has been living under Riddick’s rule after he managed to slay their leader in a ritualistic battle, winning their throne by religious default (Seriously, did you remember any this?), figures out how to banish Riddick to a barren desert-planet, tricking him into thinking it’s his alien home-world, Furia. Not-Furia, resembles a pulpy Martian landscape, filled with dangerous creatures like elongated Tanzanian-tiger-jackals, and poisonous, frog-shaped, dino-scorpions. Riddick learns how to live and survive on this planet without tools or weapons, hoping for a chance to find a way back to civilization.

                Eventually hope comes in the form of a couple of mini-crafts filled with mercenaries and space-swat, on a bounty hunt for our hero.  One of these crews contains rough-rider, mad-maxish types like wrestler turned (surprisingly capable) actor Dave Bautista and Spanish actor Jordi Malla, who manages to deliver each line of his dialogue in a way that reeks of screen-grabbing desperation and total incompetence at the same time. The second ship includes Matt Nable as the father of a character you will have completely forgotten from the first film and “Battlestar Galactica” actress Katy Sackhoff, as a strong female, lesbian character; a  gesture that would have been bravely progressive if the film didn’t have to remind us that she is both female and a lesbian every chance it had, by having two of the male characters, including our hero, threaten to rape her, and by showing her nude for basically no reason.

                Once the ‘plot’ begins and Riddick is ghosting from ship to ship trying to steal, hide, and protect giant batteries and hordes of those poisonous space-frogs come back into the picture, this movie completely loses whatever narrative traction it started out with.

                 Though ultimately buried in bad acting and poor plotting, the survivalist, space-Conan stuff at the beginning is actually pretty cool. But instead the film decides to re-tread the creature-feature tropes of the much-better executed “Pitch Black”—which in and of itself was re-tread of the “Alien” franchise.

                However, this film isn’t without its selling points. Depending on how geeky you are, you could enjoy the fact that it doesn’t seem to care at all if anybody recalls the minutia of the previous two chapters of this franchise. This movie is steeped in the Riddick mythology and if you were expecting a soft-reboot to ease you back in, you may be confused and bewildered. And good for it that it refuses to fill the audience in on its distinctly weird world and its idiosyncratic sci-fi rules and widgets.
                I wanted to fully enjoy this movie but I can’t say that I did entirely. I enjoyed the creative creature designs and the graceful simplicity of its first forty minutes. I did not enjoy the member-measuring, macho, plot-grafting of the second act, or the too-little- too-late monster mayhem at the end of the film. I left “Riddick” disappointed and frustrated, not only because so much of it was bad, but because it had started out so good.

Grade: D+


Originally published in the Idaho State Journal/Sep-2013

No comments:

Post a Comment