Monday, July 27, 2015

Ant Man review

Marvel’s latest entree “Ant Man” is a curious bobble of a film that dares a non-comic-initiated audience to hold on to the general appeal of charismatic actors bouncing around in CGI environments without the comfort or ease of John Wayne approved heroic posturing to get them through. What I’m trying to say is this movie is unabashedly geeky, in way that Marvel Studios might have underestimated a regular movie going audience to roll with without noticing. And good for it! “Guardians of the Galaxy” was definitely weird—what with talking trees and smart-alecky raccoons and what-not—but it was also nestled in a space-opera/fantasy trope that the average beer-drinking, football-throwing American’s can recognize from their childhoods as far back as “Star Wars.”  “Ant Man,” on the other hand, is a little more niche.

Michael Douglas plays Hank Pym, a scientist who learned how to shrink himself down while still having the ability to fight with the strength of ten men. He was forced to leave his secret government agency, where he fought as a spy, after he learned that the wrong developers wanted to use his tech for dangerous, military purposes. Fast-forward thirty years into the future and a younger protégée of Pym named Darren Cross (“Corey Stoll) has seemed to develop a similar enough technology that Pym feels the need to interject.  Enter a white-caller cat-burgler and hacker named Scott Lange (“Paul Rudd”), who’s trying to get his life and family together after finally being released from prison. He’s tricked by Pym into breaking his parole to steal the Ant Man shrinking suit, and after some light blackmail he  agrees to help the older inventor break into Cross’s facility to destroy the progress of the dangerous Yellowjacket.

Despite scenes of Paul Rudd learning how to telepathically control ants into sugaring his coffee or flying on the back of harnessed insects, this is basically a heist movie at its core, with a mark, a plan of action, and the booty that needs to be retrieved. What director Peyton Reed does well with this material is he brings us into this idiosyncratic world through the eyes of the affable Rudd as he bumbles his way into becoming a passive hero. Though maybe he’s a bit too passive at times - to the point of almost having no agency within the plot. Nevertheless, he’s charming to watch and he knows how to hit the comedic beats that’s laced throughout the narrative.  Moments between him and his street-wise, criminal friends—Michael Pena almost steals the entire movie away with only a handful of scenes—keep you smiling in good spirits, even when you get the feeling that the movie isn’t entirely invested in its own brand.

Things don’t work quite as well when the story shifts into more character driven territories, particularly anything involving the vague sub-plot dealing with Pym and his estranged daughter Hope (Evangeline Lilly) who is working within the offices of her father’s enemy, while secretly bringing back useful intelligence. When it came to their emotional arc, the revelation of how Pym lost his wife, or even Lang’s difficult relationship with his ex-wife and the daughter he’s barely allowed to visit, I never cared quite as much as the movie wanted me to. It’s clear that the writers wanted to ground the superhero pulp and the comedy with a thematic parallel between Lang and Pym about what it means to be a responsible and present father, but these underwritten moments register more as plot motivators than they do real character builders.

Still, “Ant Man” is a fun and unassuming summer blockbuster that’s refreshingly low-stakes and casual for Marvel action movie. The set pieces are creative and occasionally there’s stylistic flashes of a better movie that might have been possible had the studio let things bake a little longer. As it stands the heist plot could have paid off more satisfyingly and characters could have been more clearly defined, but overall this was a totally inoffensive offering, if not somewhat banal.

Grade: B -

Originally Published in the Idaho State Journal/Jul-2015

Terminator Genysis review


Time travel is the ultimate continuity etcho-sketch. It doesn’t matter how many time-lines you’ve started or how much plot there is to consider, if you set the clock back far enough you can shake the whole thing clean and start all over again. What’s disappointing about “Terminator: Genisys,” the fifth film in this wildly-inconsistent sci-fi franchise, is that every time they start over, they somehow manage to keep telling the same story.

Longtime fans of the series will immediately recognize the tropes and familiar set-ups in this film. John Conner, now played by “Dawn of the Planet of the Apes” star Jason Clarke, is the leader of the human resistance of the future robocalypse, after A.I. was made possible by a shady tech organization called Skynet. After the rebels find a time machine built by androids to kill Conner’s mother Sarah Conner (Emilia Clarke) in the past, human soldier Kyle Reese (Jai Courtney) is sent back in time to 1984 where he must protect the future of their cause.

Yada yada yada, we all know this, but where “Terminator: Genisys,” flips the script, is by pre-supposing that the machines already knew that this counter attack would happen, causing them to send a lethal, liquid-metal android (Byung-hun Lee) back in time to keep their plan in motion, thus inspiring the human resistance to send a reprogrammed Terminator even further back in time to prepare Sarah Conner for the worst possible scenarios. Wait…that’s not different at all. That’s just plot of “Terminator 2: Judgement Day.”

What THIS movie does differently is that the robots create a new safe-guard to outsmart Reese, Sarah Conner and the weirdly-aged Arnold Schwarzenegger father-bot from stopping the atomic destruction of Judgement Day—now rescheduled from 1997 to 2017—by sending back a new opponent with personal ties to the entire group.

The plot is needlessly convoluted, especially if you’re still trying to keep up with the continuity of the franchise, but the dynamics of the story are so familiar that, narratively speaking, the whole thing feels like a video game starting over from the last save-point. Despite slight variations that occur, such as newer ideas about cellphone and internet privacy/NSA paranoia, the majority of the movie still hinges on clunky action set-pieces and lazy fan-service. I’m all for timely metaphors in my science fiction, but the zeitgeist-y gesturing here is never committed to or integrated well enough to give the film any sense purpose or real gravity.  

James Cameron’s two Terminator films of the 1980s and early-90s were dark and misanthropic genre movies that reflected society’s fear of the unmitigated progress of technology amidst the slow fade of humanity within the rise of corporate competition. This film, however, is a bottom-line money-machine, banking on pre-recognized iconography rather than creativity.  With that said, Jason and Emelia Clarke are fine enough in their parts, even as they deliver some of the most preposterously bad, cliché-ridden dialogue heard this summer. Schwarzenegger’s happy to play along, but looks about as tired as the material he’s working with, while Jai Courtney, who played Bruce Willis’ son in the equally-misbegotten “A Good Day to Die Hard,” has still yet to convince me of his appeal.

“Terminator: Genisys” is a bad movie but not offensively so. The action scenes are marginally fun and the aesthetic choice to make the film look and feel dingier and grittier than the usual 3D/IMAX, millennial blockbuster was something I could appreciate, even if,  like so many other reboots and relaunches of late, everything here felt rushed and cobbled together by focus-group notes and marketing speculation.


Grade: D+

Originally Published in the Idaho State Journal/July-2015